Monday, March 26, 2012

MSRS2000 Extension Compiled Under VS2005?

We have an MSRS2000 extension that was originally written under VS2003 (.NET
1.1). We have updated our extension and compiled it under VS2005 (.NET 2.0).
We now use the extension under MSRS2005.
We would like to use the same, .NET 2.0-compiled extension dll under
MSRS2000, but receive errors when attempting to configure the extension
(presumably because MSRS2000 uses on .NET 1.1).
Is there a way to configure MSRS2000 to use a .NET 2.0-compiled extension
(without having to maintain two separate code bases - one for the .NET 1.1
extension and one for the .NET 2.0 extension)?
Thank you in advance for any suggestions / ideas.
Bill BThe RS2000 is built on .NET1.1 and runs only under .NET1.1. So, you cannot
have code built with .NET2.0 to run inside RS2000.
If your extension is compiled under 1.1 (VS2003), it might run with RS2005,
depending what the extension does and needing to test it thoroughly, but if
compiled with 2.0, then it can only run with RS2005, not RS2000.
"Bill B" <Bill B@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:495A7A23-F66E-40AA-8C4E-ADA58425AEB8@.microsoft.com...
> We have an MSRS2000 extension that was originally written under VS2003
> (.NET
> 1.1). We have updated our extension and compiled it under VS2005 (.NET
> 2.0).
> We now use the extension under MSRS2005.
> We would like to use the same, .NET 2.0-compiled extension dll under
> MSRS2000, but receive errors when attempting to configure the extension
> (presumably because MSRS2000 uses on .NET 1.1).
> Is there a way to configure MSRS2000 to use a .NET 2.0-compiled extension
> (without having to maintain two separate code bases - one for the .NET 1.1
> extension and one for the .NET 2.0 extension)?
> Thank you in advance for any suggestions / ideas.
> Bill B|||Thanks Norman. I thought that was the case, but wanted to confirm that there
is no update (or planned update) to Reporting Services 2000 to run on .NET
2.0 (and hence support 2.0 extensions).
"Norman Yuan" wrote:
> The RS2000 is built on .NET1.1 and runs only under .NET1.1. So, you cannot
> have code built with .NET2.0 to run inside RS2000.
> If your extension is compiled under 1.1 (VS2003), it might run with RS2005,
> depending what the extension does and needing to test it thoroughly, but if
> compiled with 2.0, then it can only run with RS2005, not RS2000.
>
> "Bill B" <Bill B@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:495A7A23-F66E-40AA-8C4E-ADA58425AEB8@.microsoft.com...
> > We have an MSRS2000 extension that was originally written under VS2003
> > (.NET
> > 1.1). We have updated our extension and compiled it under VS2005 (.NET
> > 2.0).
> > We now use the extension under MSRS2005.
> >
> > We would like to use the same, .NET 2.0-compiled extension dll under
> > MSRS2000, but receive errors when attempting to configure the extension
> > (presumably because MSRS2000 uses on .NET 1.1).
> >
> > Is there a way to configure MSRS2000 to use a .NET 2.0-compiled extension
> > (without having to maintain two separate code bases - one for the .NET 1.1
> > extension and one for the .NET 2.0 extension)?
> >
> > Thank you in advance for any suggestions / ideas.
> >
> > Bill B
>
>|||Well, the update that runs on 2.0 is RS 2005.
Bruce Loehle-Conger
MVP SQL Server Reporting Services
"Bill B" <BillB@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F3DAFA28-E5DA-40FD-8897-8E661FC77E09@.microsoft.com...
> Thanks Norman. I thought that was the case, but wanted to confirm that
> there
> is no update (or planned update) to Reporting Services 2000 to run on .NET
> 2.0 (and hence support 2.0 extensions).
> "Norman Yuan" wrote:
>> The RS2000 is built on .NET1.1 and runs only under .NET1.1. So, you
>> cannot
>> have code built with .NET2.0 to run inside RS2000.
>> If your extension is compiled under 1.1 (VS2003), it might run with
>> RS2005,
>> depending what the extension does and needing to test it thoroughly, but
>> if
>> compiled with 2.0, then it can only run with RS2005, not RS2000.
>>
>> "Bill B" <Bill B@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:495A7A23-F66E-40AA-8C4E-ADA58425AEB8@.microsoft.com...
>> > We have an MSRS2000 extension that was originally written under VS2003
>> > (.NET
>> > 1.1). We have updated our extension and compiled it under VS2005 (.NET
>> > 2.0).
>> > We now use the extension under MSRS2005.
>> >
>> > We would like to use the same, .NET 2.0-compiled extension dll under
>> > MSRS2000, but receive errors when attempting to configure the extension
>> > (presumably because MSRS2000 uses on .NET 1.1).
>> >
>> > Is there a way to configure MSRS2000 to use a .NET 2.0-compiled
>> > extension
>> > (without having to maintain two separate code bases - one for the .NET
>> > 1.1
>> > extension and one for the .NET 2.0 extension)?
>> >
>> > Thank you in advance for any suggestions / ideas.
>> >
>> > Bill B
>>

No comments:

Post a Comment